This week’s Future Here Now focuses on an issue that struck me over and over again while I was at the National Planning Conference last week. In many professions (urban planning being one of them), we say that we are doing what we are doing for the people - residents, customers, students, whatever - but we fail to deeply understand their motives, their desires and their behavior. Instead, we imagine how we think that they should respond to the ways that we change their environment.
And when they don’t respond like we expected, we shrug, or we explain it away, or we accuse them of not understanding their own needs, of not being rational.
What we don’t want to admit is that we very seldom get their motivations and priorities right, and they very seldom act the way we assumed that they would. And that means that our big ideas and grand plans and really lovely products very often fail to make the impact we promised — or they create unintended consequences that can be worse than what we were trying to fix in the first place.
From my perspective, the problem isn’t that our residents or customers aren’t rational actors. The problem is that too many of us who are in the business of creating solutions are more interested in our own visions than in understanding how other people actually think and work.
Signals
What we learned from the waterfront
https://www.governing.com/assessments/waterfronts-are-great-for-cities-when-theyre-done-right
One of the things we do that takes real people out of the picture is over-simplify them — into dots on a diagram, demographic assumptions, consumers. Waterfront As Tourist Destination typically failed to generate anything resembling a healthy urban life because it (a) ignored real locals in favor of idealized tourists, and (b) reduced what people were willing to do
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Future Here Now to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.